Comparing Intel Dual-Core and Quad-Core Using VMmark
Friday, 20 July 2007 by Michel Roth
Bruce Herndon has been testing VMmark on a variety of systems in preparation for the benchmark's imminent release. He has measured the performance difference between Intel's dual-core (Woodcrest) and quad-core (Clovertown) processors:

"I have been running VMmark on a wide variety of systems in preparation for the benchmark's imminent release. During this exercise, I was able to measure the performance difference between Intel's dual-core (Woodcrest) and quad-core (Clovertown) processors using otherwise identical HP Proliant DL380G5 systems. One system contained two dual-core Intel Xeon 5150 processors (four cores total) running at 2.66 GHz. The other system contained two quad-core Intel Xeon 5355 processors (eight cores total) running at 2.66 GHz. Each system contained 32GB of memory and was connected to the same VM library hosted on an EMC CX-300 storage array. Both systems were running ESX Server 3.0.1. "

Read the article here.

Related Items:

Oveview Of Dual-Core Processing (12 December 2005)
Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard To Feature Virtualization And More? (31 May 2006)
New AMD Processors With Pacifica Support To Be Launched On June 6 (17 February 2006)
Scalability And Performance Of The HP ProLiant DL380 Server With Intel Xeon Dual Core 2.8 GHz Proces (1 December 2005)
Microsoft Drops Several Windows Server Virtualization Features In Favour Of Delevering On Time (10 May 2007)
CPU limits for ESX 2.x and 3.0 (12 May 2006)
Hardware Requirements For 64-Bit Guest Operating Systems (11 May 2006)
VMware Performance Benchmark In Beta (27 December 2006)
VMware benchmark may be too little, too late (26 July 2007)
VMware ESX Server 2.5.2 Released, VirtualCenter 1.3 Expected Soon (16 September 2005)
Comments (0)add feed
password
 

busy