Virtual Server 2005 R2 Host Clustering Compared To ESX 3.0
Friday, 23 June 2006 by Michel Roth
Geert Baeke is Baeke.info has compared Virtual Server 2005 R2 Host Clustering to ESX 3.0:

Already for a while now, Microsoft supports host clustering for Virtual Server 2005 R2. This article tries to compare these features to VMware ESX 3.0 high availability and VMotion. More and more, Microsoft is using these features in pre-sales talks with customers. If you, as a potential customer, are not aware of some of the details, you might end up thinking that Microsoft’s offering is equal to VMware’s. This article will show it is not. Of course, you have to match what is offered to your needs. Depending on those needs, Virtual Server 2005 R2 might be a good fit.

To be fair, VMware provides high availability out of the box only with ESX 3.0 and its HA feature. At the time of this writing (June 22nd 2006), ESX 3.0 is only just available. ESX 2.x did not provide such a feature although some third party offerings were available.

Read hsi full article here.

Related Items:

VMware Troducts Could Gain High Availability Soon (Clustering) (29 November 2005)
TechNet Webcast: Clustering And High Availability With Virtual Server 2005 R2 (Level 200) (10 November 2005)
Upcoming Virtual Server Webcasts (28 October 2005)
Virtual Server 2005 R2 Papers (10 November 2005)
Using vmware-cmd.pl On ESX 3.0 (28 July 2006)
What You Need To Know About Microsoft Virtual Server (12 June 2006)
Citrix' XenSource XenEnterprise v4 Review (23 August 2007)
VMware Converter Beta (30 November 2006)
P2V With VMware P2V Assistant 2.1 (16 April 2006)
Step-by-Step Guide for Testing Hyper-V and Failover Clustering (1 June 2008)
Comments (0)add feed
password
 

busy