<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Citrix To Launch &quot;Citrix Workflow Studio&quot;</title>
		<description>Comments for Citrix To Launch &quot;Citrix Workflow Studio&quot;</description>
		<link>http://www.thincomputing.net</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:22:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thincomputing.net/index.php?option=com_content&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;task=view&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;id=3803&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;Itemid=17#pc_45</link>
			<description>You might not want to take the &quot;supposedly&quot; link to seriously as there are a few errors in it already. They refer to XenDesktop as a XenSource product and have apparently never heard of the Access Gateway or Linux ICA client or the fact that you can run web interface on Linux. Of course Citrix has had Presentation Server for Unix but not Linux which might have something to do with the lack of business critical GUI applications on the platform that are NOT served by Apache or other web server.

It is true that Workflow Studio might be acquisitionware but the word on the street in Orlando was that they bought some IP, not a company.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:46:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thincomputing.net/index.php?option=com_content&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;task=view&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;id=3803&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;Itemid=17#pc_46</link>
			<description>That is indeed sloppy bu ZDnet. Not in the zone at all.
What do you mean by &quot;IP&quot; in your last sentence?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:00:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thincomputing.net/index.php?option=com_content&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;task=view&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;id=3803&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;Itemid=17#pc_50</link>
			<description>I'm assuming Rich is referring to them acquiring intellectual property (i.e. people/knowledge) as opposed to product.
</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:22:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.thincomputing.net/index.php?option=com_content&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;task=view&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;id=3803&quot;&amp;amp;&quot;Itemid=17#pc_51</link>
			<description>Ah... thanks Shawn. &quot;Intellectual property&quot; for IP makes a lot more sense than &quot;Internet Protocol&quot;.... ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:25:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
